ProEnglish
Statement on the US. Supreme Court Case: Sandoval v.
Alexander
By Bob Park, Chairman
Long before Alabama was admitted to the United States as a
state, English was the language used
by the great majority of the people living within it. Non-English speaking
immigrants who moved to the state were
expected to become fluent English speakers and assimilate, and almost all did. In recognition of these historical
facts, the people of the State of Alabama voted overwhelmingly
in 1990 to make English the official language of their stale.
In reaching their decision, the people of Alabama followed
the example of many other states as well
as numerous foreign nations that have official language laws. Yet, within a
few years of the law’s enactment, a
small group of activist lawyers working in concert with sympathetic U.S. Justice Department officials were able to
nullify a key section of Alabama’s law through a class action
suit brought by a single non-English speaking resident, Martha Sandoval.
Whatever other objections can be raised against it, one
thing is clear. Sandoval v. Alexander (case
no. 99-1908) represents a blatant repudiation of democracy and the
fundamental right of American citizens
to govern themselves.
Stripped of its legal rationale, Sandoval puts the
convenience of a non-English speaking resident above
the right of the people of Alabama to make a common sense decision about the
language of their government. It
compels them to adopt a de-facto policy of multilingualism against their will. And, if it is allowed to stand.
Sandoval is certain to increase the public safety risk to Alabama
motorists and impose additional taxes on Alabama taxpayers.
There is a word in the English language for this kind of
government by judicial fiat. It is called tyranny.
The founders of this republic would never have dreamed that such tyranny
would result from the constitution
they created to protect democratic government for the American people.
There is no question that Sandoval violates fundamental
democratic principles that underlie the U.S.
Constitution, and the U.S. Supreme Court should overturn it.